In Kenya, the government has for long sponsored students to pursue their studies in private universities. However, the practice has been marred by allegations of corruption and favoritism in the selection process. The government should, therefore, consider halting this practice.
While private universities are essential in providing quality education to students, the government’s sponsorship of state-funded students in private universities raises questions of equity and fairness.
The practice creates an impression that private universities are superior to public universities, hence the need for the government to fund students in these institutions. Such a notion can have a negative impact on the public universities, leading to further underfunding, understaffing, and lack of equipment and resources to provide quality education to their students.
Furthermore, the process of selecting students to be sponsored to private universities is often not transparent, leading to allegations of favoritism and corruption. It is not uncommon for students with lower grades to be selected over their more qualified peers simply because of their connections to the individuals in charge of the selection process.
This practice promotes nepotism and corruption, which undermine the integrity of the selection process and the quality of education in private universities.
Additionally, the government’s sponsorship of state-funded students in private universities has led to the mushrooming of unscrupulous individuals and institutions seeking to take advantage of the system.
These individuals and institutions use dubious means to attract students, such as offering substandard courses and certificates, and charging exorbitant fees. Such practices do not only undermine the integrity of the education sector but also expose students to exploitation and vulnerability.
Moreover, the government’s sponsorship of state-funded students in private universities does not promote the development of public universities. Instead, it empowers private entities to make a profit at the expense of the public universities that are supposed to be the primary providers of quality education to Kenyans. Private universities are not obligated to provide affordable education to students since their primary objective is to make a profit.
Therefore, the government should consider halting the sponsorship of state-funded students in private universities and instead invest in public universities.
By investing in public universities, the government will improve the quality of education, ensure transparency and fairness in the selection process, and promote equity in the provision of education to all Kenyans, regardless of their socio-economic background.
In conclusion, the government’s sponsorship of state-funded students in private universities should be stopped. The practice undermines the integrity of the education sector, promotes corruption, empowers private entities to make a profit at the expense of public universities, and exposes students to exploitation and vulnerability.
The government should invest in public universities to improve the quality of education, ensure transparency and fairness in the selection process, and promote equity in the provision of education to all Kenyans.
More Stories
Addressing Africa’s Diabetes Epidemic: Insights from St. George’s University
Syndicated Fraud in Namanve Industrial Park Project: A Deep Dive into Collusion and Procurement Malpractice
Savannah Clinker Offers Unmatched Value to Bamburi Cement Shareholders